AI Agent Swarms: A New Paradigm for Parallel Development

As AI coding assistants mature, developers are exploring ways to scale beyond single-agent workflows. A recent experiment demonstrated building a functional SQLite engine in Rust using a swarm of six AI agents working in parallel, producing 19,000 lines of code with 282 passing tests in just two days.

What Are AI Agent Swarms?

Agent swarms treat software development like a distributed system problem. Multiple AI agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini) work concurrently on different tasks, coordinating through git, lock files, and shared documentation. Each agent claims a task, implements it, validates against tests, and pushes changes.

The key insight: force coordination through the same mechanisms humans use. Git becomes the synchronization primitive, tests become the anti-entropy force, and shared docs serve as runtime state rather than static documentation.

Key Components

• Task locking: Agents claim work via lock files to prevent conflicts
• Oracle validation: Testing against a reference implementation (like sqlite3)
• Shared progress docs: PROGRESS.md and design notes track system state
• Module boundaries: Clear separation (parser, planner, executor, storage) minimizes merge collisions
• Coalescer agent: Periodic cleanup of duplication and drift across the codebase

The Coordination Tax

In the SQLite experiment, 54.5% of commits were coordination overhead: lock claims, releases, and stale-lock cleanup. This highlights that parallel-agent throughput depends heavily on lock hygiene and task boundary discipline.

Strong module boundaries proved decisive. When agents work on orthogonal slices with clear interfaces, merge collisions drop significantly. The agents operated on parser, planner, executor, and storage components independently.

Practical Applications for SRE

Agent swarms have potential for infrastructure work:

• Parallel refactoring: Multiple agents tackling different microservices simultaneously
• Test generation: Swarms creating integration tests across service boundaries
• Documentation updates: Coordinated doc updates across multiple repos
• Incident response: Parallel investigation of logs, metrics, and configs

The pattern works best with narrow interfaces, a common truth source, and fast feedback loops.

Limitations

Current challenges include bloated documentation (shared state files grow large), rate limiting disrupting mid-task work, and difficulty tracking token usage across different platforms. Running a coalescer agent frequently is essential to manage drift.

Conclusion

AI agent swarms represent an evolution from single-assistant workflows toward distributed development patterns familiar to SRE teams. The coordination primitives mirror distributed systems: locks, consensus through tests, and shared state management.

For teams building AI-powered automation, consider how swarm patterns might accelerate infrastructure development while maintaining code quality through rigorous testing.

Explore operational AI capabilities at Akmatori, an open-source platform for SRE automation. For cloud infrastructure needs, check out Gcore for globally distributed compute and edge solutions.